<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Powerweek v3 Results + Absense</title> <atom:link href="http://www.niltomil.com/challenges/powerweek-v3-results-absense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.niltomil.com/n2m/powerweek-v3-results-absense/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 23:39:26 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: mattantonino</title><link>http://www.niltomil.com/n2m/powerweek-v3-results-absense/comment-page-1/#comment-652</link> <dc:creator>mattantonino</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 14:35:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.niltomil.com/?p=487#comment-652</guid> <description>We shot the trip for stock - we just weren&#039;t very smart about WHAT we shot.  One of the reasons I started using PicNiche, actually.  My quality seems to be in &quot;situational&quot; shots.  I think we&#039;re going to focus on that in the coming months.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We shot the trip for stock &#8211; we just weren&#8217;t very smart about WHAT we shot.  One of the reasons I started using PicNiche, actually.  My quality seems to be in &#8220;situational&#8221; shots.  I think we&#8217;re going to focus on that in the coming months.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ed</title><link>http://www.niltomil.com/n2m/powerweek-v3-results-absense/comment-page-1/#comment-647</link> <dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:46:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.niltomil.com/?p=487#comment-647</guid> <description>Interesting observations Matt. I suppose it&#039;s an issue of Quality vs. Quantity (don&#039;t get me wrong, I&#039;m sure yours all all &quot;quality shots!).
I&#039;m not in your league as far as micro-stock is concerned, but it&#039;s clear that my &quot;shot for stock&quot; images do much better than those I &quot;just upload&quot; to keep the numbers going. The strategy should be probably be around achieving a particular growth in sales rather than in total uploads. Regular and steady sellers should be the target, rather than those that achieve a few sales on Shutterstock and then a disappear into oblivion!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting observations Matt. I suppose it&#8217;s an issue of Quality vs. Quantity (don&#8217;t get me wrong, I&#8217;m sure yours all all &#8220;quality shots!).</p><p>I&#8217;m not in your league as far as micro-stock is concerned, but it&#8217;s clear that my &#8220;shot for stock&#8221; images do much better than those I &#8220;just upload&#8221; to keep the numbers going. The strategy should be probably be around achieving a particular growth in sales rather than in total uploads. Regular and steady sellers should be the target, rather than those that achieve a few sales on Shutterstock and then a disappear into oblivion!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
