<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Microstock: what bothers me</title> <atom:link href="http://www.niltomil.com/n2m/microstock-what-bothers-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.niltomil.com/n2m/microstock-what-bothers-me/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 23:39:26 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Ann</title><link>http://www.niltomil.com/n2m/microstock-what-bothers-me/comment-page-1/#comment-619</link> <dc:creator>Ann</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 03:12:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.niltomil.com/?p=457#comment-619</guid> <description>I sooo agree that this would be a Win-Win-Win for client, agency, contributor:
&quot;If I submitted an image 3 years ago and I have better PS skills now, allow me to replace the image with a better upload without losing all my stats, views, etc.&quot;
(SXP has this &quot;submit improved version&quot; feature)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sooo agree that this would be a Win-Win-Win for client, agency, contributor:<br
/> &#8220;If I submitted an image 3 years ago and I have better PS skills now, allow me to replace the image with a better upload without losing all my stats, views, etc.&#8221;<br
/> (SXP has this &#8220;submit improved version&#8221; feature)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Komar</title><link>http://www.niltomil.com/n2m/microstock-what-bothers-me/comment-page-1/#comment-591</link> <dc:creator>Komar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 18:47:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.niltomil.com/?p=457#comment-591</guid> <description>I just read this one. This post is more up my road. Great observations, you really know the agencies inside out.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read this one. This post is more up my road. Great observations, you really know the agencies inside out.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John Griffin</title><link>http://www.niltomil.com/n2m/microstock-what-bothers-me/comment-page-1/#comment-572</link> <dc:creator>John Griffin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:38:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.niltomil.com/?p=457#comment-572</guid> <description>I feel your pain on a lot of this and as the owner of a site that caters to photographers as well as buyers of images and vectors, we are always trying to listen and act on the feedback we get.  A few points,
I understand your frustration when you say something like this, &quot;Shutterstock refusing to update the photographer side of the site (views, easy image management, etc).&quot;  However then you say something like this, &quot;Small sites that promise to do things different and get no sales.  Ever.  That?s not different.  That?s the same if you?re a small site.  Here?s a hint: photographers + images + sales = more of all of the above.  Thousands of images with no buyers, thousands of buyers with few images - neither works.  Stop trying to do it overnight and BUILD your site.&quot;
I think you hit the nail on the head with these two points and they go together in a lot of ways.  It really highlights that chicken vs. the egg problem and when do you focus on your sellers needs vs your buyers needs.  Such a tough balancing act and one I would love to solve.
&quot;Sites without FTP annoy me. &quot;  Still don&#039;t get why one site in particular never got this.  Must have been by design. I would add that sites without FTP annoy me but sites with the ability to parse out IPTC data during an FTP are immediately defined as useless.
I could go on for a bit more but have to get back to work.  Interesting feedback and I am thinking along the lines that you are.  Keep up the good work. John</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel your pain on a lot of this and as the owner of a site that caters to photographers as well as buyers of images and vectors, we are always trying to listen and act on the feedback we get.  A few points,</p><p>I understand your frustration when you say something like this, &#8220;Shutterstock refusing to update the photographer side of the site (views, easy image management, etc).&#8221;  However then you say something like this, &#8220;Small sites that promise to do things different and get no sales.  Ever.  That?s not different.  That?s the same if you?re a small site.  Here?s a hint: photographers + images + sales = more of all of the above.  Thousands of images with no buyers, thousands of buyers with few images &#8211; neither works.  Stop trying to do it overnight and BUILD your site.&#8221;</p><p>I think you hit the nail on the head with these two points and they go together in a lot of ways.  It really highlights that chicken vs. the egg problem and when do you focus on your sellers needs vs your buyers needs.  Such a tough balancing act and one I would love to solve.</p><p>&#8220;Sites without FTP annoy me. &#8221;  Still don&#8217;t get why one site in particular never got this.  Must have been by design. I would add that sites without FTP annoy me but sites with the ability to parse out IPTC data during an FTP are immediately defined as useless.</p><p>I could go on for a bit more but have to get back to work.  Interesting feedback and I am thinking along the lines that you are.  Keep up the good work. John</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tim</title><link>http://www.niltomil.com/n2m/microstock-what-bothers-me/comment-page-1/#comment-570</link> <dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:40:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.niltomil.com/?p=457#comment-570</guid> <description>Crestock&#039;s arrogance in expecting Getty standards for microstock payouts.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crestock&#8217;s arrogance in expecting Getty standards for microstock payouts.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: R. Kneschke</title><link>http://www.niltomil.com/n2m/microstock-what-bothers-me/comment-page-1/#comment-566</link> <dc:creator>R. Kneschke</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:07:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.niltomil.com/?p=457#comment-566</guid> <description>It&#039;s a numbers game, so I&#039;d like to see batch processing for many image editing features.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a numbers game, so I&#8217;d like to see batch processing for many image editing features.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Greg</title><link>http://www.niltomil.com/n2m/microstock-what-bothers-me/comment-page-1/#comment-564</link> <dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:22:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.niltomil.com/?p=457#comment-564</guid> <description>How about Dreamstime&#039;s 150 hours for submittal review?  Everyone else does it in a couple of days.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about Dreamstime&#8217;s 150 hours for submittal review?  Everyone else does it in a couple of days.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
